Choosing between the KEF LS50 Wireless II and the Buchardt A500 can feel like choosing between two equally tempting desserts. Both offer a rich and satisfying audio experience, but their flavors are distinct. The KEF LS50 Wireless II, with its sleek design and user-friendly interface, is like a perfectly crafted, ready-to-enjoy treat. The Buchardt A500, on the other hand, is more like a decadent, customizable creation, allowing for precise adjustments to suit individual tastes. This article will explore the nuances of each system, comparing their sound quality, features, and overall value. We’ll consider factors like streaming capabilities, room correction technology, and the long-term investment each system represents. By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of which speaker system best satisfies your audio cravings.
Key Points to Consider
- Active speakers simplify audio setups: Integrated amplifiers and crossovers eliminate extra components, offering a plug-and-play experience perfect for a clean, minimalist approach.
- KEF and Buchardt offer distinct listening experiences: KEF prioritizes ease of use and versatile connectivity, while Buchardt emphasizes detailed sound customization for discerning listeners.
- Price and sound preferences drive your decision: KEF provides excellent value, while Buchardt’s higher price reflects its advanced features. Choose the system that aligns with your budget and desired listening experience.
What are Active Speakers?
Active speakers, sometimes called powered speakers, have built-in amplifiers. This means you don’t need a separate amplifier or receiver—just plug them in and play. This makes them a simple choice for setting up a home audio system. They house all the necessary components within the speaker cabinet, streamlining the whole audio setup.
A key feature of active speakers is the active crossover. This electronic circuit splits the audio signal into different frequency bands (bass, midrange, and treble) before amplification. Each frequency band then gets its own dedicated, optimized amplifier. This results in cleaner sound and more efficient power distribution compared to passive speakers, which require an external crossover and amplifier. This precise control minimizes distortion and allows designers to fine-tune the sound, as explained by What Hi-Fi?. Because of this built-in amplification and crossover, active speakers can deliver impressive sound quality, making them suitable even for demanding setups like home theaters, as noted by Fluance. They’re a convenient and often high-performing option for various listening situations.
Price and Positioning
Budget vs. Premium
Choosing between the KEF LS50 Wireless II and the Buchardt A500 hinges on your budget. Darko Audio’s video comparison highlights the substantial price gap. The Buchardt A500 initially launched around €4200 (with a discounted introductory price of €3750), while the KEF LS50 Wireless II retails for €2500. This difference of over a thousand euros requires careful consideration. Do the A500’s features justify the higher cost? We’ll explore this question throughout this post.
Market Trends and Pricing
The KEF LS50 Wireless II debuted at $2500, alongside the passive LS50 Meta at $1500, as noted by Digital Trends. This positioned the Wireless II in the premium active speaker market. What Hi-Fi?‘s review, which tested the speakers at a comparable price (£2250), lauded their performance. However, KEF has since implemented a new pricing strategy, making their LS Wireless collection more affordable. HIFI Trends reported significant price reductions across the range, with the LS50 Wireless II now selling for $2499.99. This price adjustment intensifies the competition with speakers like the Buchardt A500, potentially attracting buyers who previously found the KEF option too expensive. This move reflects a larger trend in the audio industry, where manufacturers strive to offer high-quality sound at competitive prices.
Streaming and Connectivity
A key difference between the KEF LS50 Wireless II and the Buchardt A500 lies in how they handle streaming. This impacts setup, user experience, and even sound quality, so let’s take a closer look.
Built-in vs. Hub Streaming
The KEF LS50 Wireless II opts for a direct approach, housing all streaming components within the primary speaker. It receives the audio signal and then transmits it wirelessly to the secondary speaker. This integrated design can simplify setup and minimize clutter. The Buchardt A500, conversely, uses a dedicated hub. You stream your music to the hub, which then relays the signal wirelessly to both speakers using WISA technology. This hub-based system offers potential advantages in terms of signal processing and future-proofing, as the hub can be updated independently. Darko Audio’s comparison highlights this key architectural difference.
Wireless Tech and Audio Quality
Both speaker systems offer a wide range of connectivity options, covering popular platforms like Spotify Connect, Google Chromecast, and AirPlay 2. They also support Bluetooth for quick connections. Importantly, both systems are Roon Ready, a significant plus for serious music fans. However, a notable difference exists in audio resolution. The Buchardt A500, due to its WISA implementation, is limited to 24-bit/96kHz PCM audio. The KEF LS50 Wireless II supports higher resolution files, a potential advantage for those with extensive high-resolution music libraries. This difference, also noted by Darko Audio, might be a deciding factor for audiophiles. The KEF LS50 Wireless II also features the 12th generation Uni-Q driver array, a signature KEF design integrating the tweeter within the midrange driver for improved coherence and imaging, as detailed in Sound & Vision’s review.
User Experience and Setup
Setting up your speakers should be straightforward, not a headache. How these two systems approach user experience differs significantly, impacting how quickly you can enjoy your music.
App Interface and Control
The KEF LS50 Wireless II shines with its intuitive app, often compared to the ease of use of Sonos. If you’re not a tech wiz, this user-friendly approach is a breath of fresh air. You’ll be streaming your favorite albums in minutes. Buchardt takes a different path with the A500. There’s no dedicated app, which might feel like a step back compared to the KEF’s seamless control (Darko Audio). This could mean more manual adjustments and less streamlined access to features.
Installation and Configuration
Under the hood, the LS50 Wireless II boasts a seriously upgraded streaming board compared to its predecessor, the original LS50 Wireless (Darko Audio). This gives the KEF Connect app more power, resulting in a robust and reliable streaming experience. The Buchardt A500, however, offers a deeper level of customization. Features like room correction and master tunings allow you to fine-tune your sound based on your specific room’s acoustics. This adaptability makes the A500 a strong contender for those seeking a truly personalized listening experience.
Sound Quality and Performance
This is where we get down to brass tacks—how do these speakers actually sound? Both the KEF LS50 Wireless II and the Buchardt A500 are known for their hi-fi performance, but their sound signatures have some key differences.
Frequency Response and Bass
Let’s talk low-end. The Buchardt A500 digs deep, reaching down to 25 Hz, giving you that truly visceral bass experience. The KEF LS50 Wireless II, while no slouch, bottoms out at 40 Hz. This difference is noticeable. If you crave that rumbling low-end, the Buchardt has a clear advantage. As noted in one comparison, “It’s very obvious that the Buchardt go lower; they go all the way down to 25 hertz… the KEF only go down to 40 hertz.” (Darko Audio comparison) This doesn’t mean the KEF’s bass is weak, just that the Buchardt delivers a more substantial sub-bass presence. Think of it like the difference between hearing a bass drum and feeling it in your chest.
Imaging, Soundstage, and Mid-Range
Moving beyond bass, the KEF LS50 Wireless II and Buchardt A500 offer distinct presentations. The KEFs are known for their focused mid-range, which translates to a clear and engaging listening experience. Their imaging—the precision with which they place instruments and vocals in the stereo field—is often praised. One reviewer observed, “the KEF is contrasted as a much more mid-range focus loudspeaker… its imaging is a bit better than the Buchardt’s, just a little bit.” (Darko Audio comparison) The Buchardt A500, however, counters with a taller soundstage, creating a more expansive sense of space. Imagine the difference between a concert in a small club versus a grand concert hall. While the LS50 Wireless II excels in clarity within the lower treble and upper mid-range, described as “a more exciting loudspeaker to listen to,” the Buchardt’s broader soundstage offers a different kind of listening pleasure. (Darko Audio comparison) Which is “better” ultimately depends on your personal preference and the kind of music you enjoy.
Advanced Features and Customization
Room Correction
Both the KEF LS50 Wireless II and the Buchardt A500 offer room correction, but they approach it differently. The KEF LS50 Wireless II provides basic room correction within its app, allowing for adjustments to bass roll-off and treble. This helps tailor the sound to your room’s acoustics, useful for mitigating common issues like boomy bass. You can adjust the sound, but the options are somewhat limited. Think of it as a helpful starting point. Learn more about KEF’s features on their product page.
The Buchardt A500 provides more in-depth adjustments, giving you finer control over how the speakers interact with your room. This level of customization is ideal for serious listeners who want to optimize their sound. Buchardt Audio’s website offers more details on their approach.
Sound Profiles and Tuning
The two speaker systems also differ in their approach to sound profiles and tuning. The KEF LS50 Wireless II offers basic tuning options within its app, letting you tweak the overall sound signature. It’s a user-friendly system that lets you make quick adjustments.
The Buchardt A500 offers “master tunings”—pre-configured sound profiles that you load onto the speakers using a USB stick or the Buchardt app. This system provides a deeper level of customization, allowing you to experiment with different sound signatures. It’s a more involved process, but it offers greater flexibility. You can find more information about the master tunings on Buchardt’s website. This approach, combined with the advanced room correction, positions the A500 as a speaker for serious audio enthusiasts.
Target Audience: Casual Listeners vs. Audiophiles
Choosing the right speaker depends on how you plan to use it. Both the KEF LS50 Wireless II and the Buchardt A500 deliver great sound, but they cater to different listening styles. Understanding these differences will help you make the right choice.
KEF’s Broad Appeal
The KEF LS50 Wireless II system appeals to a wider audience, especially casual listeners who appreciate high-fidelity audio without needing deep technical expertise. As Darko Audio notes, the KEF LS50 Wireless II offers excellent value, making it attractive for those not ready to invest in pricier systems like the Buchardt A500. Check out Darko Audio’s comparison. Its user-friendly design makes it a solid pick for anyone wanting a simple setup and great sound right out of the box. TechRadar reviewers praise its “superb sound quality,” “easy setup,” and “wealth of connectivity options,” highlighting its suitability for a broad audience. It’s the kind of system you can easily add to your living room and enjoy without fiddling with complicated settings.
Buchardt’s Audiophile Focus
The Buchardt A500, conversely, targets audiophiles—those who appreciate the nuances of sound and enjoy fine-tuning their listening experience. Darko Audio describes the A500 as a “power user” speaker, perfect for those who want to optimize their sound and are comfortable using software and room correction tools. Watch the full video. Features like room correction and software adjustments allow for a highly personalized experience, appealing to listeners who want complete control over their sound. Audiogon discussions show that many users choose the A500 specifically for these advanced features, even if they like the KEF system’s wireless convenience. The A500 suits those who see audio as a hobby and enjoy perfecting their sound.
Tech Advancements and Impact
Audio Tech Innovation
The KEF LS50 Wireless II and the Buchardt A500 represent distinct approaches to audio engineering. The KEF LS50 Wireless II features dedicated amplifiers for each speaker: 100 watts Class A/B for the tweeter and 280 watts Class D for the mid-woofer. Combined with digital processing and crossovers, this setup creates a powerful, dynamic sound. A Sound & Vision review notes how the LS50 Wireless II builds upon and refines KEF’s earlier designs. The Buchardt A500, on the other hand, prioritizes room correction technology and customizable DSP settings. This allows listeners to tailor the sound to their specific environment, offering a high level of control, as discussed in this Darko Audio comparison.
Smart Feature Integration
When it comes to connectivity, the KEF LS50 Wireless II offers a broad range of options, including Roon, Spotify Connect, Google Chromecast, AirPlay, and Bluetooth. The accompanying KEF Connect app streamlines setup and control, making for a user-friendly experience. What Hi-Fi? praises the system’s intuitive operation. The Buchardt A500 also provides standard connectivity features, but its real strength lies in advanced room correction and master tuning capabilities. This focus on optimizing the listening environment, highlighted in this Darko Audio video, makes it an attractive option for discerning audiophiles.
Making the Right Choice
So, you’re ready to upgrade your sound system, and you’ve narrowed it down to the KEF LS50 Wireless II and the Buchardt A500. Excellent choices! This section will help you make that final decision. It really comes down to three things: your budget, how you like your music to sound, and what kind of value you’re looking for.
Budget and Room Acoustics
Let’s talk dollars and cents. The KEF LS50 Wireless II is around $2,500, while the Buchardt A500 system (including its hub) is closer to $4,400. That’s a considerable price difference (Audiogon Discussion Forum), so consider how much you’re comfortable spending. Your room also matters. The KEF LS50 Wireless II adapts well to different room acoustics, meaning it can sound great in various spaces (Darko Audio).
Listening Preferences
How do you like your music to sound? This is where personal taste comes in. The KEF LS50 Wireless II has a fantastic mid-range and creates a precise soundstage (Darko Audio). If you love hearing all the details in your music, this might be the one for you. The Buchardt A500 offers a more balanced sound overall. Neither is inherently “better,” it simply depends on what sounds best to you.
Long-Term Value
Think of this purchase as an investment. The KEF LS50 Wireless II is a significant improvement over its predecessor, with better sound and more connection options (What Hi-Fi?). This makes it a solid value. The Buchardt A500, while more expensive, is built to last, in terms of construction and performance (HIFI Trends). If you want a top-tier system that will hold its value, the A500 is worth considering.
The Evolving Audio Landscape
Consumer Trends
The hi-fi market is constantly changing, with new tech and evolving consumer preferences driving innovation. One clear trend is the demand for high-quality audio paired with user-friendly experiences. People want great sound without the complicated setup. This shift is perfectly illustrated by the popularity of active wireless speakers like the KEF LS50 Wireless II, praised by TechRadar for its “superb sound quality, an easy setup, and a wealth of connectivity options.” What Hi-Fi? also weighed in, calling them “among the most thrilling speaker systems we’ve heard.” This all-in-one approach, combining amplification and streaming in a compact design, appeals to a broad audience—from casual listeners to serious audiophiles. Another interesting development is the increasing affordability of high-fidelity audio. KEF recently adjusted prices across its LS Wireless collection, including the LS50 Wireless II, making premium sound more accessible.
Performance and User-Friendliness
The KEF LS50 Wireless II demonstrates how manufacturers are prioritizing both performance and ease of use. Each speaker houses its own amplifiers, simplifying setup and delivering impressive power. KEF’s signature Uni-Q driver array, which places the tweeter within the midrange/bass driver, contributes to the speaker’s detailed and immersive sound. A key differentiator in the active speaker market is the user interface. While some speakers, like the Buchardt A500, lack a dedicated app, the KEF LS50 Wireless II offers a sophisticated app, comparable to Sonos. This makes setup and control much easier, especially for those new to hi-fi. As Darko Audio notes, the A500 caters to experienced users who enjoy tweaking settings, while the KEF system, with its user-friendly design, welcomes newcomers. This focus on intuitive control is a major factor in the growing popularity of active speakers.
Related Articles
- Q Acoustics Q Active 200 Speaker Review – Supermarket Sound
- Sonos Five Vs KEF LSX: Which Speaker Is Best? – Supermarket Sound
- Buchardt A500: Customizable Sound And Advanced Features – Supermarket Sound
- High-End Audio Systems: A Beginner’s Guide – Supermarket Sound
- Building A Hi-Fi System: A Beginner’s Guide – Supermarket Sound
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need a separate amplifier for active speakers like the KEF LS50 Wireless II or Buchardt A500?
Nope! That’s the beauty of active speakers. They have amplifiers built right in, so you don’t need any extra equipment. Just plug them into a power source and you’re ready to go.
What’s the main difference between how the KEF LS50 Wireless II and Buchardt A500 handle streaming?
The KEF LS50 Wireless II has all the streaming smarts inside the main speaker itself. The Buchardt A500, on the other hand, uses a separate hub that you connect to. You stream to the hub, and it sends the music to the speakers.
Which speaker system offers better sound quality, the KEF LS50 Wireless II or the Buchardt A500?
They both sound fantastic, but they have different strengths. The Buchardt A500 has deeper bass, while the KEF LS50 Wireless II is known for its clear, focused mid-range and precise imaging. It really boils down to what you prefer.
Are the KEF LS50 Wireless II and Buchardt A500 difficult to set up?
The KEF LS50 Wireless II is generally considered easier to set up, thanks to its user-friendly app. The Buchardt A500 doesn’t have a dedicated app, which might make the process a bit more hands-on.
Which speaker system is better for someone new to high-fidelity audio?
The KEF LS50 Wireless II is probably a better starting point. It’s simpler to set up and use, and it offers excellent sound quality at a slightly lower price than the Buchardt A500.
